Freedom of Marriage Essay

The reasoning of any just law is meant to be acute and, more all over, fair. However, the politics has failed to recognize the nears of many American citizens because they do non conform to partys stereotypical standards. In a nation founded on emancipation, have at onces citizens evolved into narrow-minded drones that bind minorities into what they believe are the correct moral standards? put on the staple fibre freedoms guaranteed by our forefathers been stripped forward in order to protect the exact moral codes confederacy has placed upon itself.Same-sex spousal relationship should be legal because it is loaded to get over human being couples the same respectables as straight couples. The illegalization of same-sex wedding party excludes funny couples from the same monetary marital benefits guaranteed to espouse heterosexuals. The denying of these respectables is no womb-to-tomb a decision to be do by the U. S. government as ghostly beliefs are strongly imbedded in the communion of spousals. Contrary to common beliefs, the legalization of same-sex labor union has non degraded the traditional determine associated with a trade union.The typographyal right of matrimony is currently being denied to many American citizens. The actions of many have contributed to discrimination against a minority who deserve their birthright as American citizens to join in transvestic unions. Exclusion of marital benefits from tribadistic couples contributes to the bear-sized financial strain of being queer. taxation relief, family health care benefits, social security spousal benefits, and inheritance rights all change magnitude the financial burden on get married heterosexual couples, but these benefits do non pertain to married homosexuals today.All of these benefits excluding same-sex couples get to an exponentially higher cost of living. In our worst case, the couples biography cost of being fearless was $467,562. nevertheles s the number fell to $41,196 in the scoop case for a couple with importantly better health insurance, plus glower taxes and other costs. (Siegel Bernard, Lieber) The numbers represent the discriminatory effects of illegalizing homosexual join. Same-sex couples, become strangers to the basic rights of liberty and the pursuit of happiness, and re at risk for minority stress and its health consequences. (Riggle, Thomas, Rostosky)In a country founded on equal rights, American laws pertaining to audacious spousal relationship necessitate punishment on individuals moreover seeking to gain a right heterosexuals already have. Religious beliefs present the most(prenominal) persuasive arguments against the legalization of gay marriage. The bulk of religions strictly prohibit the union of homosexual couples as the union supposedly to tarnish the spiritual ceremony of marriage.Some may recognize the validity of this argument however, the U. S. government should non be influenced by this phantasmal defense when considering illegality of homosexual marriage. America was founded on the belief in freedom of religion, which is why 221 years ago the first amendment to the U. S. constitution restricted the government from having any sacred affiliations. The amendment stands today as the overpowering counterpoint against illegalization of gay marriage due to religious conflicts.The government does non have the right to illegalize homosexual marriage ground solely on religious rampart of the practice. Many individuals believe that same-sex marriage depart annex the already high separate rates. This belief is propelled by the misconception that the institution of marriage reserve be weakened by the allowance of homosexual unions thus change magnitude leniency of break up. Allowing same-sex marriage will not impair family determines, but will or else generate a invigorated family dynamic.This new model of a family will not affect the traditional aspects o f a family it will simply leave the option of same-sex marriage open. The derogatory affects of same-sex marriage in society are so minimal that, In Massachu conditionts, which legalized gay marriage in 2004, the divorce rate has declined by 21 per centum and is the lowest in the country by some margin. The state which experienced the highest increase in its divorce rate over the period (Alaska, 17. 2 percent) also happens to be the first one to have neutered its constitution to prohibit same-sex marriage in 1998. (Silver) Based on these statistics, same-sex marriage will not be detrimental to society.Those argue gay marriage often press that a homosexual couples inability to procreate is what makes them ineligible for marriage. It is patent that is anatomically impossible for homosexual couples to reproduce, leading(a) many to question the purpose of gay marriage if procreation is unfeasible. Marriage was created to allow society to subscribe to heterosexual couples in pro creation and society can use up not to give the same benefits to same-sex couples. (Jacobson) If marriages only purpose were to support reproduction, homosexual couples would have essentially no purpose for getting married.However, many successfully married heterosexual couples cannot reproduce because of incurable medical conditions. Without the ability to procreate, they would be clean denied the right to marriage as healthful as homosexuals. Therefore, the argument presented is invalid because it does not address all couples without the ability to reproduce. The illegalization of same-sex marriage is to be determined by the value society places on fairness.Economically homosexual couples should give birth the same compensations for being married as heterosexual couples are provided with. The way outing reimbursements would abate financial struggles many homosexual couples assemble over the course of their lifetime. Spiritually gay couples deserve the right to freely displ ay their sexual desires without any discriminatory actions convey by religious followers. Furthermore, the government should not consider these religious beliefs when determining the laws narrowing ones one right to participate in a homosexual marriage.Although many believe that the allowance of gay marriage will directly result in higher divorce rates, the freedom to be in a gay marriage has shown no direct coefficient of correlation to divorce rates in states granting gay marriage. The illegalization of gay marriage is discriminatory against a minority of American citizens whose only desire is to be stipulation the same rights as heterosexuals. The prejudice opinions opposing gay couples must be set aside in order for homosexuals to receive the benefits they fairly deserve.